AdWords is the sincerst form of flattery.

15 10 2006

Update: This blog post was originally pulled. This post explains why I pulled it back.

One of our consultants did a search for “readify” on Google last night and notice that one of the other Microsoft partners in Sydney had purchased the “readify” AdWord from Google.

You’ve got hand it to Adam, he certainly runs an aggressive marketing campaign and I’d be worried if he somehow managed to push us off the top rankings in the search results.

Still - can someone purchasing your AdWord be considered a form of flattery?


Actions

Information

10 responses to “AdWords is the sincerst form of flattery.”

15 10 2006
Ayende Rahien (22:07:30) :

Personally, I find it in bad taste.

15 10 2006
Mitch Denny (23:04:14) :

Hi Ayende,

I guess its what AdWords allows you to do. My blog post was just to let Adam know that we noticed :)

16 10 2006
Mitch Wheat (02:05:03) :

Oh he’s a naughty boy!

Isn’t that considerd trade mark infringement?

I’m assuming he’s actaully purchased the SSW adword as well…..

16 10 2006
Mitch Denny (02:35:04) :

Hi Mitch,

He has removed the AdWord for Readify now (not sure why). I don’t think he had one for SSW.

16 10 2006
Why did I pull a blog post today? « notgartner (12:49:30) :

[...] Upon reflection, I’ve decided to put the post back up because so many times I’ve complained about people that pull their blog posts, and I got a bit of criticism about that. Its actually better to be up front about this stuff - this post is to explain the situation. [...]

16 10 2006
Alex Lowe (17:39:31) :

Hey Mitch…not one but two Community Server competitors have bought the AdWord for “Community Server”. =)

16 10 2006
Mitch Denny (21:09:46) :

Hi Alex,

What text did they put for the actual advertisement? There are a whole bunch of questions not so much around ethics, but what is actually healthy for your own business form an advertising point of view.

17 10 2006
Alex Lowe (11:56:58) :

The text seems pretty neutral. I mean, there isn’t anything misleading in the text (from my perspective anyway).

One thing I’ve been thinking about is whether or not this form of “competitive advertising” is possible/likely to happen in other mediums (say non-Internet forms of advertising). I don’t think it is. The only thing I could think of would be someone paying a magazine, for example, to place a competitive ad and then have the index mislead the reader to believe that the ad was for another product. Of course, I don’t believe any magazine publisher would do such a thing and this is definitely a knock on Google/AdWords in my opinion.

17 10 2006
Mitch Denny (21:36:30) :

Hi Alex,

Yeah - I don’t really have a problem with it. Its just a curious approach and I don’t think its that effective. I am sure that Adam will probably point out his views when he produces the rules. Its probably one of these two edged sword things, the edges get sharper the smaller the community is.

23 10 2006
lb (07:10:26) :

classic stuff!!

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>