Is Marshall Kirkpatrick on crack?

I probably shouldn’t pick fights with my betters, but after stumbling across the following line in his post about Microsoft “open sourcing” the .NET framework, I couldn’t resist:

“It’s hard to say what the incentive was for this move, it could be that .NET adoption in the developer community has been so small that a drastic step was needed…”

(emphasis mine)

It might be my implant speaking, but I’ve never regarded .NET adoption in the developer community to be particularly small. It is hard to get solid numbers but I would argue that in the enterprise space .NET adoption probably leads Java, and Java has been around longer. By enterprise I pretty much mean “behind-the-firewall”.

In the wild I’d suggest that public ASP.NET sites are more popular than Java, although I don’t know how well Microsoft is competing with itself in replacing Classic ASP, I still see quite a few well known sites running Classic ASP, although they aren’t really leaping forward in the sophistication stakes.

Of course in the wild Microsoft also competes with PHP, and more recently Ruby and those two platforms are going strong, especially Ruby which has a number of successful high profile implementations thanks to frameworks like Rails.

My point is however is that .NET adoption is solid, it is competing and it is a remarkably complete platform, perhaps more so than anything out there at the moment. I ask myself every day whether I want to jump over to developing on a Mac and building web-apps with Ruby to the exclusion of everything else, but I realize that I’d probably miss some of the features that I’ve grown to love about the .NET Framework.


3 thoughts on “Is Marshall Kirkpatrick on crack?

  1. Marshall

    ha ha, not crack – just giant bong hits first thing in the morning: all the sudden no one’s developing in .net and i’m qualified to comment on the situation. and pigs are flying πŸ˜‰ just another morning, thanks for calling me on it. best, m

  2. Wilecoyote

    Careful mate… read it again…. he is not directly saying that…. its framed around the words… it could be… and reading on hes asking a pointed question about what motivated the source code release…

    Its actually a good question as it would appear to go against Microsoft’s corporate policy… but as I see it… who cares what motivated the move… its a good move… as to the politics… leave that to the politicians… Im just a geeky developer…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s